the usual secret codes in SDP CLAN'S whatever day message

SDP CLAN has never ceased to amaze whenever there is a special day. so it's labour day, may lst. and what is their message? another hidden agenda which ends off with "happy wishing". what irony! their secret message instigates once again the peasants to rebel against the LEEgime.

they never miss an opportuniy to preach their "messages" - x'mas day - rebel against the gov. chinese new year - rebel against the gov....APRIL FOOL'S DAY - rebel against the gov.

what other days would their message hide another secret code of REBEL AGAINST THE GOV?? when shall SDP CLAN ever stop? perhaps, they are nearing their total annihilation soon. hey! they should be ok! they already have a standby reserved clan set up - USD CLAN or U SEE DITDIT clan - all standing by for mass migration when SDP CLAN is finally obliterated.

The Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) has published its May Day message on its website. (Click here to view it.)

In its message, the SDP says that Singaporean workers “have been systematically reduced to mere digits without dignity and tenure of employment”, by a ruling party that has “morphed into an authoritarian capitalist outfit”.

The SDP also says there is no protection for workers, because they are unable to form independent trade unions to safeguard their rights, such as their rights to a minimum wage, retrenchment entitlements, or job security in the face of an unchecked inflow of foreigners.

The SDP wants to see a minimum wage law enacted, a Singaporean First policy in place, weekly working hours respected, and rampant exploitative practice of contract labour curtailed.

ah juan's secret letter.....

master chee secretly sent a letter by his carrier pigeon to PM. as he knew that everyone in the LEEgime was quite allergic to him, he exploited his sidekick orhbalan to do it. clever hor? anything happen orhbalan sure kena laulan!! or blame for any misgiving.


Advantageous for the PAP to leave Bukit Panjang as it is

Posted: 20 Apr 2010 10:24 PM PDT

Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) has written to the Prime Minister’s office to leave Bukit Panjang as a Single Member Constituency in the next General Elections (GE).

SDP claims on its website that the party has been visiting the constituency for years and has intensified their work there since the last GE in 2006.

They say, “We will put in everything to wrest the seat from the PAP (People’s Action Party).”

It is quite obvious that SDP and PAP have taken polar positions on the issue of the wet market takeover and the subsequent wet market stalls rental hikes by Sheng Siong Supermarket in Bukit Panjang.

Dr Teo Ho Pin the current elected Member of Parliament (MP) of Bukit Panjang constituency has maintained that “market forces should determine the rental (hike of 30% by Sheng Siong)”.

Whereas, the SDP has said that market forces cannot determine the market stall rentals because Bukit Panjang has got only one wet market and without another wet market to offer competition to Sheng Siong, there can be no market forces at play in this issue.

The governing party of Singapore has often alleged that Singaporeans have “repeatedly rejected Dr Chee, his politics and his party”, while the SDP blames its electoral defeats on the political system of Singapore, which is in a dire need of democratic reform.

If the Bukit Panjang SMC is left intact as it currently is, it will not only be an opportunity for the voters there to decide to support or reject the current MP and his performance, but it will also be a perfect opportunity for the current government to bring home its point (if SDP loses) that Singaporeans have indeed rejected the SDP.

And if the SDP won, it would also be to the advantage of the PAP for then, they could slam home the message that the political system is fine and needs no drastic reforms as claimed by the SDP.

But of most advantage to the PAP, would be its ability to tell the rest of the electorate at the next GE that it is not afraid of a fair fight.

The Prime Minister should instruct the Elections Department of Singapore, which comes under his purview to seriously consider the request of the SDP to leave Bukit Panjang Single Member Constituency as it currently is, as the Elections Department redraws the electoral divisions for the next GE.

————————

SDP’s letter to the Prime Minister’s Office:





————————

SAIKONG'S FINAL SHOWDOWN WITH LEEGIME

goh meng seng without his saikong gown

saikongseng was trying to setup KAI PANG CLAN or BEGGAR CLAN to have a final showdown with pap's LEEgime. it was either a win all or lose all situation. ah seng was leeported to be selling his mansion for 400K taels to invest in his quest to conquer tampines GRC province. if he succeeded, his hk wifey and daughter would come over peesailand to live happily ever after with him. but if he failed, then he would balek kampung to HK to live unhappily ever after with his family there.

the wagers are now on! would saikongseng win the magistrate post or MP and rule over tampines? if he loses, what would be his next plan? really to live in exile in hk?? how now? BET LAH!! lai ah!! 3:2, u bet ah seng win, u get 3 taels for 2 wager :)

国民团结党秘书长吴明盛　准备卖屋参加大选

国民团结党秘书长吴明盛出售组屋，为大选筹钱 。（档案照）
·赢了，淡滨尼买屋；输了，全家去香港。
·更多内容，看20.04.2010《新明日报》。

准备单挑淡滨尼的国民团结党秘书长吴明盛，今早向《新明日报》证实，他打算卖掉他在实龙岗北的四房式组屋，为来临的大选筹备资金。

他最近向朋友谈起要卖组屋的事，让朋友感到震惊，消息就这样传了出来。

吴明盛说，他是在1997年间，以31万元的转售价买下这间组屋单位，房屋贷款为20年。

他的太太是一名新闻官，和6岁女儿长期居住在香港，而他在父亲于2008年去世后，就跟81岁的老母亲住在宏茂桥。

目前，他让朋友住在这间于实龙岗北的组屋，但已通知他做出搬迁的准备。

全文，看20.04.2010《新明日报》。

gms has now unwittingly exposed himself to the elements. yep! he has dropped his undies!

his ardent stalkers of cowards and losers especially from the SDP IB are smirkingly scheming now and realise his weak point n vulnerability.

besides facing the imminent bombarbments by paps to brand him as a QUITTER LOSER should he lose, pap opponents might use such words as "irresponsibility" and "non-commitment" and other new words they would cook up to hit at gms who's now a sitting fat duck waiting to be roasted into a yummy peking duck!

there are also the troll lamei who gms had offended for not shaking her properly - the hands i meant when she offered it and trying to seduce the family-oriented loving husband seng. along with lamei lurk a bunch of ninja turltes who would be easily F&D to do her biddings and gohmengseng is her one time favorite target.

take a leaf from the recent squabbles. chee vs chiams and ngtecksiong/ejay vs KJ/RP, it would be very proabable that this revelation about ah seng selling his flats would result in another fracas.

so keep an eye on the ST FORUMS. sure many would write io criticise gms.

then what about u guys?

scroobal proposes a "fund raising". is he for real or just trying to get some media attention?

can a guy so petty to have censured most of my postings and many others be that magnimanious , generous, sincere and helpful?

whatever it is, the only things let for us to do is to pray that ah seng wins the next GE. to do so, ah seng shall need all the voluntary help the brothers and sisters can generously offer. if u cannot help in cash, then help in service.

during the GE, there's alot of labour intensive works need to be done.

MAKE SURE U GUYS BE THERE WHEN THE DUTIES CALL FOR IT!!

my pyschedelic purple technicolored sexmobile

saikongseng


inside the sexmobile - so cosy and romantic!


{ PICTURE CENSORED}
the pyschedelic purple techniolored sexmobile



saikongseng and his "blissfully married" wifey LEETAHSAR


their offsprings which is a bunch of LITTLE DINGDONGS :D

mysterious oracle coming true......

leetahsar's oracle to KJ is coming true

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Setting the record straight
Reform Party founders challenge Kenneth Jeyaretnam's claims in interview

Letter from Ng Teck Siongand Gopal Prabha Former Chairman and former Vice-Chairman, and co-founders of the Reform Party 05:55 AM Apr 19, 2010

We refer to the exclusive interview "I am my own man: Kenneth Jeyaretnam" (April 8) and would like to correct defects in certain points he raised about our history.

It was incorrect of him to claim that the Reform Party did not hold Central Executive Council (CEC) meetings for about four or five months prior to his so-called "election" as secretary-general.

After the passing of our party chief Mr J B Jeyaretnam on Sept 30, 2008, we held four meetings - on Oct 17, 2008, Nov 15, 2008, Feb 21, 2009 and March 21, 2009 - save the ones for December 2008 and January 2009 due to the festive seasons and year-end holidays. We even held a party forum on Feb 28, 2009 at the Allson Hotel. All these have been documented.

His allegation that the party was in quite a bad state et cetera was again unsubstantiated. Both of us prepared the accounts, kept them up-to-date and reported the affairs at every CEC meeting. We also got them completed for the year ending March 31, 2009, which was in time to submit the Annual Returns to the Registrar of Societies.

We focused our attention on building up our logistics and the finances - crucial to our survival. Our cash flow was improving and we were slowly, but surely, progressing.

With four electoral successes with those opposition teams in our bags, exposure to town council management and a long standing technical know-how, we felt we were better placed to oversee a new opposition political entity and promulgate its interests.

No doubt we had only a School Certificate and a Diploma between us and not "double-firsts" from Cambridge.

After a motion to make him secretary-general of the party at our seventh CEC meeting on March 21, 2009 was rejected, he started taking a condescending approach to us. We gave him ample opportunities to follow protocol and to talk to us, but he did not follow.

It all culminated on April 26, 2009 at what was to be our eighth CEC meeting, when he initiated a change in leadership with help from certain CEC members. He even summoned the long ago, resigned, ex-treasurer to come and aid in his cause.

Had we stood our grounds and fought, it would have all spilled out to the open, prematurely. We adjourned, let him off the hook and stepped aside, keeping mum.

Now we take this opportunity and wish to set the record straight. We believe that one needs to be genuine and humble fundamentally to lead fellow men. We gave the party the "Sun" logo - the epitome of Truth!

We called ourselves the Reform Party, whose agenda is to be freed from false illusions and to build the foundation for the future betterment of Singaporeans.

way back before all this nonsensical petty squabbling begins, my li'l brother has emailed KJ and cautioned him about my pet snake slithering away in his party. this has finally come to light that dissidents of RP have turned traitorous to slime mercilessly against the party they professed that "they have founded with the late JBJ".

how could this be so when what we see now is making the pap smirking with joys. the traitors are trying to nip the bud of RP before it could bloom gloriously. poor KJ! for those with faith in JBJ should also have their faith in his son KJ and support him all the way until victory be with RP and traitors shall choke on their own false allegations.

one very vital question KJ must clear. did my pet snake sow the discord or enhance it while he was briefly there? KJ must make to realise those ninjas are very good at borrowing others' parangs for the kill.

chee uses my pet snake and he in turn uses an old goat to get to the unwary KJ. for those who know more, u must share the details so that we can see the true colors of SDP ninja turtles hard at work.

according to report, ng teck siong is now with SDP and so is ngejay. can someone confirm?

the son, the father and the puppetmaster

victory soon as the puppetmaster?



transssssssformation pet ssssssssnake


Mr Ng Teck Siong intends to hold a press conference at Speaker’s Corner on Saturday evening (10 Apr) to make a public statement regarding Mr Jeyaretnam’s remarks about the Reform Party and Mr Ng’s leadership. Details will be announced as soon as they are available.


did any attend ah siong's talk that evening?

this is an extract from his "son" ng ejay who i believe is trying to exploit leeporters to print his "father" ah siong's displeasure against RP and its chief KJ. the reason is obvious.

ejay quit RP as soon as he joined it. the reason was unclear why he joined and quit just as fast as he protested and stripped his red t-shirt or went to court and PG as fast as he paid the reduced fine and zoomed off to post more yabadabado in his blog to excuse for his as fast as he could be action.

now why ng teck siong isn't taken seriously when he joins SDP? little has been heard about his prowess in SDP except he's now the most popular puppet wayanged by son who is none other also the slippery puppet master.

i m so bloody proud of my pet snake who's other new found talent discovered in puppetry.

father/son tag team match against KJ, RP's chiefy

shin min chinese daily - the chinese paper that exposed it all. remember the bashing of the wife stealing lawyer?

KJ hinted that that was a mysterious and greater force which was manipulating ng ah teck for suddenly attacking him. hardly did he know that that force was JJ, the long lost son of ah teck.

when warding off ah teck lauhanku's tofu soft blows, wham! bamm!! alakazam!! from behind JJ executed his deadly groin kick. ouch!! KJ was hit which explained why he always covered there whenever he did his walkabout round in the province.

luckily for KJ, he wore his ball-guard, nothing devastatingly. the precious were still dingdonging there. now it was his turn to hit back. a tight slap! spraccccccccck!! ooh!! both father and son team were hit with five fingers printing reddening across their cheeks. and the fight went on......
Former Reform Party chairman takes its chief to task

Posted: 11 Apr 2010 01:43 PM PDT


By Ng E-Jay

Former Reform Party chairman Ng Teck Siong has spoken to the mainstream press, taking Kenneth Jeyaretnam, the party’s Secretary-General, to task for making remarks that implied the party was a rudderless vessel devoid of leadership under Mr Ng’s charge.

Mr Jeyaretnam had said during an interview with TODAY newspaper that when he assumed leadership of the party in April last year, it was a “drifting, rudderless empty vessel” in which “morale had dwindled, the number of members had decreased and there hadn’t been central executive committee meetings for about four or five months.”

Mr Ng held a press conference on Saturday evening at Hong Lim park during which he read out a personal statement to a gathering of around a dozen, refuting Jeyaretnam’s claims.

In his statement, Mr Ng revealed that there had been a total of four CEC meetings held between October 2008 and March 2009. Meetings in Dec 08 and Jan 09 had been called off due to the holiday season. Photocopied minutes of the meetings as well as attendance lists were put on display by Mr Ng at Speaker’s Corner to demonstrate the veracity of his assertions.

Mr Ng also said that the party’s coffers were slowly being built up by sales of JBJ’s books, an activity that Mr Ng claimed was frowned upon by Kenneth Jeyaretnam.

Mr Ng then went on to elaborate on the events surrounding the CEC meeting held on 26 April 09 which resulted in the motion of no-confidence passed against him as well as the election of Mr Kenneth Jeyaretnam as Secretary-General.

According to Mr Ng, several CEC members had refused to sign the attendance list and were not allowing the meeting to proceed as planned. Mr Ng then vacated the meeting. He was absent when the motion of no-confidence was passed against him.

Mr Ng said this incident was “terribly unfortunate”, as he had originally intended to “embark on the party’s second phase of development” after expelling a couple of members including Mr Balraj Naidu from the CEC.

On Sunday, Mr Ng also spoke to the Shin Min Daily News, which quoted him as accusing Mr Jeyaretnam of displaying arrogance and leading the party down a misguided path.

During his interview with Shin Min, Mr Ng countered Jeyaretnam’s earlier allegations that he had failed to find a successor to the post of Secretary-General in a timely fashion by stating that a decision had been made to elect a new Secretary-General in April 09, but Mr Jeyaretnam had been very impatient with the process.

Mr Ng also asserted that the Reform Party under Kenneth Jeyaretnam’s leadership has lost its original direction as laid out by the late J.B. Jeyaretnam. He said that Mr Jeyaretnam’s sole focus on economic matters to the neglect of political rights was misguided.

Mr Ng also expressed interest in contesting the next general elections.



Kenneth Jeyaretnam says he will not respond further

Separately, Mr Kenneth Jeyaretnam told the Shin Min Daily News that it would be inappropriate for him to continue responding to Mr Ng Teck Siong’s comments.

Mr Jeyaretnam would only clarify that when he told TODAY reporter Loh Chee Kong that the Reform Party was a rudderless vessel at the time he assumed leadership of the party, he was referring to the unfilled post of Secretary-General, and his remarks were not meant to be an indictment of Mr Ng or anyone else.